After just more than a year after their loss, the Cook family got recognition.
Following the passing of Senate Bill 753, and with the support of Sen. Charlie Shields, R-St.Joseph, a portion of Belt Highway will now be known as the Deputy Charles M. Cook Memorial Highway.
Mr. Cook died from injuries he suffered in an on-duty wreck while in pursuit of a reported erratically driven motorcycle on June 23, 2007. St. Joseph Police Department records revealed that Mr. Cook’s brother-in-law — Aaron Smullin, 18, of St. Joseph — was a passenger participating in a citizen ride-along when the early morning wreck occurred.
A formal dedication ceremony was held at the Law
Enforcement Center Thursday. Several members of law enforcement as well as the community witnessed the unveiling of one of the highway signs that are now posted on Belt Highway. Mr. Cook’s teary-eyed wife, Renee, and young son, Trevor, both helped Mr. Shields unveil the sign.
“We should do more than this, and we can do more than this to honor this brave young man,” Mr. Shields said.
During the ceremony MoDOT presented Trevor and the Fraternal Order of Police with miniature road signs dedicated to Mr. Cook. The St. Joseph Highlanders played “Amazing Grace” following the unveiling.
The portion of Belt Highway named for Mr. Cook runs from Frederick Boulevard north to the intersection of Gene Field Road. A few hours after the ceremony the signs were ready to be posted.
Mr. Cook, at age 28, was the first Buchanan County deputy to die while on duty since Horry Fish, who died in 1868 during an inmate attack at the jail.
“Now the community won’t forget what he did,” said Sheriff Mike Strong. “His family, his son, and his son’s children and grandchildren will know what he did.”
This is the second memorial highway dedication for Mr. Shields. In 2001 he helped successfully designate the 2.7-mile stretch of Interstate 29 between Frederick Boulevard and U.S. Highway 169 North in St. Joseph as the Sgt. Robert Kimberling Memorial Highway. Mr. Kimberling, a Missouri State Highway Patrol trooper, was killed in the line of duty.
Megan Tilk can be reached
at megantilk@npgco.com.
Once again my heart goes out to the Cook family for their loss, however, Robert Kimberling was shot during a traffic stop by a fleeing fugitive, Deputy Cook, while not wearing a seat belt, pulled out in front of a semi to chase a speeding motorcycle, as he had a citizen passenger in tow for a "ride along". Comparing the two seems to be wrong some how.
It's too bad that Senator Shields can not or will not spend as much if not more time creating a bill that will toughen the sentences on those who commit crimes against children. Perhaps that task is a little more difficult than getting a patch of highway renamed. I hope when he is up for re-election the voters will take notice of his "accomplishments" or lack of them when it comes to serious issues, to protect those who cannot protect themselves.
Posted by barneybad66 on August 29, 2008 at 7:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)FYI rush620 Charlie didn't pull out in front of a semi,the semi was pulling onto the belt hwy as Charlie was cresting the hill.Charlie was a friend of mine and I don't believe this is the place or article to vent about Mr. Shields.
Posted by joetowner on August 29, 2008 at 8:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)and Mr. Shields won't even be up for re-election, he will be term limited
Posted by missouri_mule on August 29, 2008 at 8:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)He DOES NOT deserve a highway named after him! HE put himself, and others in danger by traveling at over 80 MPH on the Belt! Trying to catch a high performance motorcycle?? WOW!!
All though I am sorry for the loss of a fine deputy, naming a road after him is just stupid!
As mentioned above, Robert Kimberling was shot trying to take out a mad man that would have killed others had he not have been stopped, I do not see where a speeding motorcycle was ANYWEAR close to posing that kind of threat.....
He was all hyped up on adrenaline thinking about a chase, not thinking about the public!
Posted by rush620 on August 29, 2008 at 8:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)As I said before barney, I don't mean any disrespect to Deputy Cook or his family as I know he is desperately missed, and was a good man, my point being, does this warrent a stretch of road being named after him, especially the exact area in which the wreck happened? Wouldn't a scholarship fund have helped more people to explore law enforcement as a proffession and kept his memory alive rather than a street sign? There are many worthy charities and programs out there that a "Deputy Charles Cook Memorial Fund" could have been a part of. As tragic as the whole thing is there are still people who believe that Deputy Cook was partially at fault. Right wrong or in between, I feel that there were better ways to remember Deputy Cook than to rename a portion of the Belt Hwy that will always be the Belt Hwy.
Posted by joetowner on August 29, 2008 at 8:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)I think a lot of people have questioned the justification of this rush, but I think berney's point of now debating this only instills more pain in the family. I think it's better to just let it be now, your opinions aren't going to do anything to rescind the naming of the highway. It's unfair to cause the family anymore pain or grief because of your feelings on the highway renaming, whether it is right or wrong.
Posted by rush620 on August 29, 2008 at 8:54 a.m. (Suggest removal)joetowner - you are right. I'm done.
Posted by gr8fan on August 29, 2008 at 9:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)If it is OK to name things after people who made a name or difference in St Joseph without any discussion as to what they are getting recognized for is right or wrong, I have a suggestion. If that is the case, Joetowner, maybe we ought to change the name of the town to Jesse James, Missouri. Discussions are healthy. If I were a relative or friend and had thin skin about the situation, I don't think I need to be on this site.
Posted by devinbroncs123 on August 29, 2008 at 9:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)I am with Joetowner on this. Let the family be. This really isn't the place to debate this. I neither disagree nor agree with anyone's thoughts on this. I just think we need to leave it alone. Discuss it in person with your firends and family. Not in a place where his family can read it.
Posted by MichaelH on August 29, 2008 at 10:31 a.m. (Suggest removal)What do people mean this isn't the place to discuss this?
Is this a local event?
Is there a story being printed?
Is there a, "comments" section below the story?
I don't know that I could find a more suitable place to discuss this issue.
One of my fondest memories of Charlie was driving from Sacremento to San Fransico together in a Mustang convertable. Getting lost in San Fransico together in March in our short sleeves, top down and watching all the area natives walking the streets in parka winter coats! It was a lot of fun and we had a blast that night. I'll always remember it. We played softball together and were consistently the teams punching bags, lol.
Having shared friendship, laughs and slept in the same room as Charlie before, is someone going to tell me I can't voice my opnion?
I said from the very begining that this was a poor choice for doing something. A scholarship fund would have been nice. Or how about a Deputy Charlie (not Charles, he was not Charles) Cook outreach program - a program that would allow a weekend a year to display the vehicles, equipment and objectives of local law enforcement to the public?
This would have given citizens a platform to ask questions, get to know their local law enforcement and shed some light on things people are most confused about when it comes to law enforcement. They could've showcased the abilities of their K9 units, held a meet and greet and give citizens an idea of just what goes on inside a police cruiser.
For far too long we have allowed our civil service professionals to run around in wrap-around shades, windows sealing them off from the public - these people have become, "non-humans" and they really only have themselves to blame.
Police need to make themselves more approachable. Take the damn sunglasses off when you're driving through neighborhoods. Rool down your friggin' windows and wave to the children you see admiring your neat cruiser with it's cool lights on top.
All of this could have been done in the name of Charlie. Instead we have a junk section of the Belt Highway in his honor.
Why does that leave a bad taste in my mouth.
Charlie, you will be forever missed, buddy. I miss wrestlin' with ya and tossing back some cold Busch lights on Darrin's front porch. I wish things could be different for you and yours but I will always hold fond in my heart the memories of a young man who was always his own person, never let people get him down and had the most infectious country-boy laugh I've ever heard.
RIP good buddy.
Posted by comment on August 29, 2008 at 11:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)I'm with Joetowner. My heart goes out to the family.
Posted by devinbroncs123 on August 29, 2008 at 11:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)That's cool MichaelH. All I am saying is that the debate should be brought elsewhere in regards to whether it was right or wrong because of what he did. He ides in the line of duty. I respect that. I feel that he is deserving of something. I was trying to shut up the negative comments. Not you. Remembrance is awesome. You shouldn't have taken it so personally.
Posted by MichaelH on August 29, 2008 at 1:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)No offense taken, I simply wanted to express that this should be an avenue for discussion if that's what people choose to do.
If flaggrant insults are thrown around, the NP will remove them.
As said before, discussion is very healthy and breeds critical thinking which can help both in our personal lives and the decisions we make in them.
Posted by stjoecitizen on August 29, 2008 at 2 p.m. (Suggest removal)Charlie was a wonderful person. He would do anything for anybody anytime. In my opinion if you dont like the fact that they re-named part of the belt, just dont look at the sign when you drive by it. And hopefully, we can leave it at that.
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them.
Rules: We don't allow comments that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Epithets, abusive language and obscene comments will not be tolerated... nor will defamation. Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatent cutting and pasting is not acceptable.Robust, even heated debate we like. Straying off-topic or flaming, we don't. Please read our user agreement.
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.