Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Plan would help vets with college costs
Bill would help veterans with costs of college
by Alyson E. Raletz
Monday, February 18, 2008
Nathan Schmitz, a Northwest Missouri State University student, leaves campus Thursday afternoon. Mr. Schmitz is retired from the U.S. Navy. A bill before Missouri lawmakers would make college more affordable for Mr. Schmitz and other veterans like him.

Photo by Jessica Stewart / St. Joseph News-Press / Purchase this photo

Nathan Schmitz, a Northwest Missouri State University student, leaves campus Thursday afternoon. Mr. Schmitz is retired from the U.S. Navy. A bill before Missouri lawmakers would make college more affordable for Mr. Schmitz and other veterans like him.

A bill before Missouri lawmakers could change the life of a 26-year-old veteran at Northwest Missouri State University.

“I’d have more of one,” Nathan Schmitz said of a having a life if a proposal to limit tuition of combat veterans passes.

It’s also the same proposal a St. Joseph Republican took some heat over when he tried to change it.

Originally from Parnell, Mo., Mr. Schmitz joined the U.S. Navy at age 18 but left the service after six years, specifically to pursue higher education. Many of his friends opted for government contract work after their active duty service ended, but Mr. Schmitz is going after a bachelor’s degree to make himself more attractive in the job market.

The geology major now is in his second year of study at Northwest, where tuition runs $148.60 per credit hour plus fees for in-state undergraduates.

He’s one of 83 students who uses the G.I. Bill to pay for tuition at Northwest, according to fall enrollment figures.

The G.I. Bill covers most of his tuition and fees, but the full-time student had to get a part-time job at a Maryville lumberyard and move into low-income housing to make ends meet. This is the same soldier who was maintaining decoder equipment for the Navy in the Persian Gulf in 2002. His unit was sent there in response to the Sept. 11, 2001, tragedy in New York.

Senate Minority Floor Leader Maida Coleman, D-St. Louis, for three years has been trying to help men and women like Mr. Schmitz with a bill that would make college more affordable.

Ms. Coleman’s SB 830 would cap tuition Missouri institutions could charge veterans to $50 per credit hour.

“So many veterans don’t have marketable job skills after leaving the military — and they’ve been killing people,” she said. “This gives them the opportunity to learn job skills so they can improve their lives.”

The veterans would have to maintain a 2.5 grade-point average and have served in armed combat since 9/11.

Senate Majority Floor Leader Charlie Shields, R-St. Joseph, attempted to amend the bill last week by making the effort subject to state appropriations each year.

At the request of the University of Missouri, Mr. Shields argued that the state and not the colleges should bear the financial burden of the tuition breaks. He eventually yanked the amendment after encountering staunch criticism. MU’s hourly tuition is closer to $250 per credit hour.

Ms. Coleman said she saw the attempt as an attack on the bill and could have killed it.

Sen. Jason Crowell, R-Cape Girardeau, criticized Mr. Shields and MU for not affording veterans the tuition relief similar to the discounts faculty family members receive. Mr. Crowell accused Mr. Shields of “yielding to the gimme, gimme, gimme university.”

“All they gotta do is plop another chair in the classroom,” Mr. Crowell said. “... Do you want to vote for the University of Missouri or vote for Missouri veterans?”

Mr. Shields said he didn’t believe his amendment would’ve killed the bill, which he supported. “We all want to be patriotic. The question is, who are we going to be patriotic with?” Mr. Shields asked.

The entire University of Missouri system would have to eat $2.4 million under the original proposal, which would have covered graduate courses.

Now that the bill only limits undergraduate tuition, Ms. Coleman said she believed the MU system would absorb less than half of a million dollars.

MU lobbyist Jim Snider said he believed the university system would have to foot more than that, but didn’t provide a figure he deemed more accurate.

“We support the bill. There’s no question about that,” Mr. Snider said. “The question comes down to whose responsibility is it to pay?”

At least 135 veterans used the G.I. Bill to pay for tuition at Missouri Western State University in 2007, but President Dr. Jim Scanlon said he didn’t believe the $50 tuition cap would have a dramatic effect on university finances.

He pointed to another stipulation of the bill, which requires that any other financial assistance be applied using true tuition rates before the $50 cap kicks in.

Veterans can’t receive more than the actual cost of attendance when the limitation is combined with any other financial assistance made available to them.

“This is not a substantial issue for us,” Dr. Scanlon said. “I recognize and applaud the desire of folks in Jefferson City to reward combat services of veterans.”

So, it doesn’t look like Mr. Schmitz will be moving into a luxurious apartment anytime soon, even if the bill goes through. But with any extra assistance in paying the remaining tuition and fees his G.I. Bill doesn’t, he might be able to “have a life.”

“I wouldn’t have to work all the time,” he said.

For the ex-soldiers who chose more expensive universities, “This would help them so much,” he said.

The Senate gave the bill first-round approval last week. It needs a successful third reading before moving to the House of Representatives.

Alyson E. Raletz can be reached

at alysonraletz@npgco.com.

Comments
This story has 2 comments. Click here to join in on the discussion.
Story Tools
Hyperlink Legend
E-mail story
Print friendly version
iPod friendly version

Today's Top Headlines
A darn good dog
New county inspector takes on variety of tasks
Soldier shares stories from war
Palin to resign from office
What are the benefits of art?
  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
dj February 18, 2008 at 7:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Sen. Coleman's quotation - "So many veterans don’t have marketable job skills after leaving the military — and they’ve been killing people." - has to be the absolutely dumbest thing I have ever heard. Has she never spoken to a veteran? Soldiers come out of the military with strong training in both marketable job skills and life skills. "And they've been killing people." What in the heck does that have to do with anything? Did she just have to throw that in because she's so liberal? And does she really have her facts straight? Does she actually know how many veterans in the last 20 years have killed people?
If there were an award for Unbelievably Stupid Comments, she would win hands down.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
comment February 18, 2008 at 11:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

So why limit it to just combat veterans? What about the veterans who may have not saw combat? Seeing combat was not always their choice but they were supporting the combat troops. The rewards should go to all those veterans who volunteer with the possibility of going into harms way.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: