Repair bid higher than anticipated

A bigger-than-expected price tag has delayed repairs at the Wyeth-Tootle Mansion.

The city initially hoped to begin work on the building's aging exterior in mid-August so the project would be complete in time for the holiday lighting ceremony in December. Plans changed when the city reviewed the only bid for the project. At $808,147, it was more than double the $350,000 the city budgeted for the job.

The city will use a base bid and a deductive alternate bid in an effort to work around high costs. Public Works Director Bruce Woody explained the process.

The base bid would cover costs for repairs on all four of the mansion's walls, while the alternate would require the contractor to fix only the north and west walls.

In another change, the city will shift from a "lump sum" bid to a method that sets unit prices, so contractors know how much they will spend if the project unexpectedly grows. Mr. Woody said he thought the lump sum bid was a big reason only one of the four contractors that showed interest in the project actually submitted a bid.

"What we heard after the fact was that some of them may have been intimidated, because they thought the lump sum put a lot of risk on the contractor," Mr. Woody said. "Hopefully this will reduce their risk and share it between the city and the contractor."

The city will advertise for bids this month, with hopes that construction could begin in October. Details on specific parts of the building that will be repaired are not yet available.

St. Joseph Museums Inc., which operates the mansion for the city, has a list of projects it will complete on its own dime. The city's delay may allow SJMI to start plans it cannot complete while the city is working. For example, a jackhammer working on one wall could make it hard for a carpenter trying to install intricate trim on the other side.

"We've been talking about what we can do to move ahead," said Jackie Lewin, executive director of SJMI. "We were concerned with doing interior painting on the exterior walls because we didn't know how their process would affect us."

The museum's Buildings and Grounds Committee will discuss potential projects at its next meeting.

Ms. Lewin admitted that she wished the city could move faster on its share of the repairs. But if the job gets done, she is willing to wait.

"It will be fine as long as the city eventually has the money to do the work that's needed," Ms. Lewin said. "Right now, for us to have groups and exhibits there ... we really wish it would be better. We're just waiting I guess."

Clinton Thomas can be reached

at clintonthomas@npgco.com.

Share Your Thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every removal suggestion. Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed. Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed. Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven. Comments posted in all caps will be removed. Stay on topic! Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable. Comments must be kept under 250 words or less. Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy. Click here for our full user agreement.


heritage_sarahhochschwender says...

as someone who did my own project "backwards" (and learned the hard way), i am astounded that every penny spent initially is not going towards the exterior envelope of this building. this is exactly why it is irrational to have the city and the managing entity at cross purposes.

who were the contractors which expressed interest, and who actually submitted a bid? what is the list of "projects " which are anticipated by SJMI? painting? trim work? you are kidding me, right? take every cent the SJMI is alloted and do the exterior , correctly and immediately. every delayed month causes more deterioration and drives up costs. this story is incomplete.

August 4, 2009 at 9:04 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

RichardSaunders says...

Revoking the contractually-obligated funding would pretty much end SJMI and ensure a new lawsuit. Surely that isn't your goal?

August 4, 2009 at 4:49 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

238er says...

This will fix it:

http://tiny.cc/3aI6T

August 4, 2009 at 6:03 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

apmastrangelo says...

238 - I would hope this is tongue in cheek.
This is part of the problem in the current arrangement and needing priorities set for facilities having structures requiring distinct upgrading. Also a disadvantage when you do not have a clear perception on that needing to be done; no inference to the ability of anyone involved but apparent given the circumstance.

August 4, 2009 at 6:51 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

238er says...

One of the problems is the ownership structure. SJMI has no had incentive to maintain the building since they did not own it. The city had no incentive to maintain it since there was a reverter clause. Point fingers at each other.

This is not to say that individual SJMI board members didn't try. The city choose to ignore its obligations for too long.

August 4, 2009 at 10:17 p.m. ( | suggest removal )