NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Nixon vetoes helmet law
by St. Joseph News-Press
Thursday, July 2, 2009

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Gov. Jay Nixon has vetoed legislation that would have relaxed a Missouri's mandatory helmet law for motorcycle riders.

Nixon said Thursday that he rejected the bill because keeping the helmet requirement was the "safe and cost-effective choice for Missouri."

The legislation would have allowed people 21 and older to ride without helmets on all roads except interstate highways.

After the measure was approved by lawmakers, it became the focus of an intense lobbying campaign.

The governor's office received more than 1,000 letters and e-mails, many urging Nixon to sign the bill. The Missouri Department of Transportation commissioned a poll in an effort to persuade Nixon to veto it.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
He_who_opines_behind_anonymity July 2, 2009 at 2:59 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Thank God at least one elected official still has a brain.

Recommend:
+ 5
- 3
chara July 2, 2009 at 3:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

i agree,surprised but thankfull. now need to do something with those damn scooters runing around. can't see em. don't they pose just as much of a hazzard. seems like there just as big a danger to the riders,make them follow the same rules.

Recommend:
+ 3
- 3
HannahBelle July 2, 2009 at 3:26 p.m. (Suggest removal)

We've been riding street and dirt bikes since 1970's and adage, "It's Not IF You Wreck Your Motorcycle, It's WHEN" is 100% true...

Recommend:
+ 3
- 0
weese July 2, 2009 at 3:50 p.m. (Suggest removal)

When will stupid people be allowed to be stupid?

Recommend:
+ 2
- 0
weese July 2, 2009 at 3:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

chara, If I want to ride MY scooter and risk MY life than so be it. We aren't harming anyone.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 2
10377586 July 2, 2009 at 4:29 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Scooter riders should be required to have a motorcycle endorsement and wear a helemt.

Recommend:
+ 3
- 1
Mr_America July 2, 2009 at 4:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I think it should be up to the rider. I feel the same way about seatbelts. We should at least have the freedom to make poor decisions.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 1
pops July 2, 2009 at 6:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)

It's not about making poor decisions....those "poor decisions" cost society millions every year. Seems that not only are some people really stupid, they ALSO feel that when they MAKE such poor choices, and the laws of physics makes them pay for their poor choices, they want the insurance industry to pay them for making that choice!! If they want to ride without a helmet or without a seatbelt, they should understand their insurance won't cover them.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 0
Leonie July 2, 2009 at 7:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I totally agree with you pops! Our parked truck was totalled by an uninsured speeding drunk driver without a seatbelt. My insurance paid for my truck and he went to the hospital and public funds paid for his hospital bill. We spent days arguing for enough money to cover the cost of our truck and ended up taking a loss on our legally parked truck. Plus our insurance went up. He never spent a second in jail and no one ever filed charges-how fair is that? He was totally doing whatever he wanted, breaking law after law. I am sure he felt just like these idiot who say they are hurting no one by riding without a helmet or seatbelt, but he was wrong and so are they.

Recommend:
+ 2
- 1
pops July 2, 2009 at 7:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I hear stories like this one, and it makes me angry. Too many people living life with little or no responsibility. If you don't wanna wear a seatbelt or motorcycle helmet...fine. It leaves more oxygen for the rest of us who are still alive after your accident.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 1
pops July 2, 2009 at 7:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Just don't expect us to pay for your stupidity through higher taxes or higher insurance rates.
As for scooters...I feel they, too, should have to wear helmets. I ride a bicycle back and forth to work, both for the savings in gas, as well as for the fitness it generates. I NEVER ride without a helmet. With a helmet, I might have a chance. Without it, I have a better chance of winning the Powerball!! Any of you helmetless wonders out there won the Powerball lately? You have a better chance of winning that, than you do of surviving an accident without your helmet....bikes, scooters OR motorcycles.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 1
JAFO July 2, 2009 at 7:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

good call jay.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
TDubb July 3, 2009 at 12:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Weese, if it were only that simple...if it were only that simple...

Mr_america, if that's the way you feel - see Leonie's post above mine. it should give you some insight as to why we wear seatbelts, helmets and do not drive intoxicated.

As for Pops, I agree with you on all points except one. Scooters are under the same restrictions as bicycles. However, I'm more familiar with Japanese law as far as scooters go(I was a US MP in Japan). They treat any motorbike of any sort as a bicycle if it's under 50cc. I'd imagine there's a similar distinction for scooters here in Missouri.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 0
Mr_America July 3, 2009 at 8:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I will refrain from refering to anyone as stupid or an idiot and just say that we will just have to agree to disagree. I do wear a seat belt and everyone that rides with me has to do the same but that's got more to do common sense than a law. We don't need laws to tell people with half a brain how to stay safe. The bottom line is I don't want to live in a nanny state.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: