NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

MoDOT poll triggers budget veto by Nixon
Governor cut $33K as payback
by By DAVID A. LIEB/Associated Press

Saturday, June 27, 2009

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Gov. Jay Nixon has vetoed money for the Missouri Department of Transportation in retaliation for a publicly financed lobbying effort against a bill relaxing Missouri’s motorcycle helmet mandate.

The department recently spent about $33,000 on a public opinion poll showing that a majority of respondents favor an existing state law requiring all motorcycle riders to wear helmets.

Department director Pete Rahn cited the poll during a news conference outside a hospital emergency room last month while urging Nixon to veto a bill allowing people age 21 and older to ride helmet-free on all Missouri roads except interstate highways.

On Thursday, Nixon vetoed $33,000 from the transportation department’s administrative budget for expenses and equipment during the fiscal year that starts Wednesday. The Democratic governor said in a written veto message that the cut was “due to administrative inefficiencies.”

Nixon spokesman Jack Cardetti confirmed Friday that the veto was in response to the poll on the motorcycle helmet law, which was funded from Missouri’s share of federal highway safety money.

“The governor thought that political polling was a waste of taxpayers’ dollars and therefor he took it out of their administrative budget for next year,” Cardetti said.

Transportation department spokeswoman Sally Oxenhandler said Friday that agency officials “have no response at this point” to Nixon’s veto.

Nixon has until mid-July to decide whether to sign or veto the motorcycle helmet legislation.

The governor’s office has been inundated with e-mails from motorcyclists urging him to sign the legislation. Those e-mails, obtained by The Associated Press under the open-records law, include several in which the authors describe assurances by Nixon that he will sign it.

In an interview with the AP last month, Nixon denounced the poll, declaring: “Taxpayers are darn sick and tired of people spending public money to lobby public officials like that.”

Rahn has defended the poll as part of the department’s mission to promote highway safety, asserting that more motorcyclists would be killed and injured if Missouri’s helmet law is relaxed.

After the line-item veto, the department still is budgeted to receive more than $27 million from state road funds for administrative expenses, equipment and personnel.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
megafrog June 27, 2009 at 9:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Jay Nixon is a bitter hack.

Recommend:
+ 2
- 3
rk92559 June 27, 2009 at 12:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

****publicly financed lobbying effort***

For those that don't know, this is the PC term for Bribes.

Put it on the ballot and we can vote on it, like should happen. But not only should this not happen, there should be a public investigation as to just who got that "public finance" in their pockets.

Recommend:
+ 3
- 0
longarm45 June 27, 2009 at 5:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I certainly agree with rk92559!
A "poll" to tell us what's "GOOD FOR US" funded by OUR tax dollars!!!
Just like the wonderful energy bill, which will penalize coal burning power plants EVEN MORE , etc.

Recommend:
+ 2
- 0
been_there_seen_that June 28, 2009 at 3:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I don't see the $33,000 cut as a 'payback'. I see it as a responsible attitude toward wasteful spending by the DOT administration. I notice the poll wasn't wanting to know what we thought about our roads?

Recommend:
+ 2
- 0
10377586 June 28, 2009 at 5:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Good job Jay.

Recommend:
+ 2
- 0
grannytuff June 29, 2009 at 9:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Thank you very much Governor Nixon. Hopefully this is a small step TOWARDS the end of wastful spending. All the help you are willing to give to quit wastful spending is very much appreciated as always. Everybody/Everything must begin with baby steps to be successful.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: