A matter of life or death

First Christian Church supports doing away with death penalty

Dennis Fritz lost 11 years of his life.

Mr. Fritz, who now lives in Kansas City, was sentenced to life in prison in 1988 after being charged with the murder of a woman who worked at a bar in Ada, Okla., he'd been known to frequent. Police claimed that hair found at the crime scene had been microscopically analyzed and determined to be his.

It wasn't until 1999 that further DNA testing revealed the hair was not Mr. Fritz's but actually belonged to the man who had been the state's main witness at Mr. Fritz's trial. Mr. Fritz was freed at last - but not before years of injustice took away his chance to see his daughter grow up and to otherwise live his life as he should have been able to.

Unfortunately, statistics show Mr. Fritz isn't alone in being wrongly charged with murder and suffering severe consequences because of it. Some have been exonerated only after being put to death for crimes they allegedly committed - and it's in light of this that First Christian Church in St. Joseph has hosted Mr. Fritz and others with similar stories who shared about their experiences.

In addition, the church voted Sunday to pass a resolution calling for a moratorium on executions of Missouri inmates on death row. This resolution supports a bill now in the Missouri legislature - HB 1870 - sponsored by Rep. Bill Deeken of Jefferson City. If the bill is passed, no executions will take place in Missouri until 2012. And during this moratorium period, a committee will study the details of cases in which the death penalty has been sought and will recommend remedies for deficiencies it finds.

"In Matthew 25, Jesus specifically mentions ministry to people in prison as ministry to him," says the Rev. Chase Peeples, pastor of First Christian. "In our society, there is perhaps no group that could be considered 'the least of these' more than people in prison, especially those in death row. Without approving of any crimes that may have been committed, we can declare that because of God's love for them, each person on death row deserves a fair trial, competent legal counsel and access to the latest in DNA technology."

This is a bipartisan issue, and both people against the death penalty and those in favor of it can support the moratorium - simply because how the death penalty is carried out now isn't just, adds Reva Fields, chairwoman of First Christian's outreach committee.

"Everyone realizes there are some flaws in the system," she says. "Over the years, I've always had some concerns about innocent people being affected."

The church member who brought the issue before the outreach committee and suggested the congregation be given an opportunity to voice support for the moratorium was David Tushaus, the chairman of Missouri Western State University's criminal justice and legal studies department.

"Even the American Bar Association says the death penalty is not justly and equitably administered," he says, adding that a disproportionate number of death-row inmates are minorities, poor and can't afford legal help. "Any injustice is a problem, but when you have injustice that involves the ultimate penalty, it matters even more."

More than 70 church members voted in favor of the resolution, and two voted against it, the Rev. Peeples says. The resolution will now be sent to the campaign headquarters for the moratorium and to Sen. Charlie Shields.

Mr. Tushaus - who is willing to make presentations to any other churches or organizations interested in bringing the resolution before their members - notes that this isn't the first time a bill for a death-penalty moratorium has been introduced in the Missouri legislature. Often it takes several introductions for a bill to gain enough momentum to be passed, he says - but he hopes this will be the year this bill does.

"I think this is an issue all religions that care about justice should take a stand on," he says.

Lifestyles reporter Erin Wisdom can be reached at ewisdom@npgco.com.

Share Your Thoughts

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.


rhmski says...

I get really tired of these bleeding heart liberals. The crime rate is at an all time high especially repeat offenders. The reason the death penalty is not a great a deterrant as it could be is the wishy-washy government who cave in to the bleeding hearts in this country. People have a right to a speedy trial victims should have a right to a speedy execution of criminals sentenced to death.

March 21, 2009 at 10:28 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

JLS says...

rhmski, did you not read the article? It is about the possibly WRONGLY accused. It is about making sure that those who are sent to death row are truly guilty. It is to assure that those who are sentenced to death have had a fair trial, competent legal counsel and access to the latest in DNA technology.

It isn't about liberals; it isn't about wishy-washy government; it isn't about using the death penalty as a deterrent! It is about a FAIR trial and sentence for everyone.

Put it this way...if one of your family members is wrongly accused of a crime and sentenced to death or even life in prison, you wouldn't want every avenue explored??? They should just be put to death because you think there are too many bleeding hearts?

Mr Fritz isn't the first who has been wrongly convicted and he won't be the last... our job as citizens is to do everything in our power to make sure it doesn't happen again.

March 21, 2009 at 11 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

heritage_sarahhochschwender says...

i can certainly testify to the FACT that the federal government makes false arrests. i am a former advocate for the death penalty. NO MORE.

at the risk of pointing out the ridiculous obvious fact........the death penalty is not reversible once it is carried out.

March 21, 2009 at 11:22 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

rhmski says...

I figure that if Mr Fritz was arrested he had to be guilty of something at sometime and probably deserved what he got. This goes for all the other "innocent" criminals on death row. I would feel the same about my own family probably more so!!

March 21, 2009 at 3:45 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

jen_2302 says...

We as citizens must take our voting privilege serious to get honest people in the positions that make these decisions. This resolution is a second chance for the mistakes of the people we elect. John Grisham's true story "The Innocent Man" is the story of Fritz and another Ron Williamson. What a terrible thing that happened to both of them, for the sake of justice in those elected officials mind, when they knew the 2 were innocent. They needed someone to convict since they couldn't find the real killers. It was terrible what happened to them.

To rhmski: you have that much trust in our legal system that you think Frisk did "something" and deserved what he got. A murder charge? The elected officials are in fact human too.

March 21, 2009 at 8:44 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

chasepeep says...

As the minister of First Christian Church and one of the folks quoted in this story, I'd just like to offer a few comments. First, thanks to Erin Wisdom for writing a good story and getting the facts straight. Second, I wish whatever editor wrote the headline had actually read the story. Although many members of our church, myself included, are opposed to the death penalty on moral and religious grounds, not all members of the church are opposed to it. What we voted for was to support a moratorium on executions in MO, because the current system is so obviously flawed. The headline is a bit misleading. I urge anyone interested in the issue to find out more about the bipartisan movement to study and improve our state's use of the ultimate punishment. Thanks for reading.

March 21, 2009 at 9 p.m. ( | suggest removal )