NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Lawson Deal Will Benefit S.S. Victims
by Joe Blumberg
Sunday, May 3, 2009

A complicated and slow restitution process in the Bonnie Sue Lawson case just became much simpler.

Also, a second person is being investigated by the FBI for fraud in the case, according to four people who attended a meeting this week between the FBI and Buchanan County officials. That second possible theft could total about $14,000, sources said.

The Social Security Administration confirmed Friday that it will directly repay Ms. Lawson’s victims rather than repay them slowly as Ms. Lawson’s restitution trickles in.

“We will pay those folks back and then go after Ms. Lawson for the money,” said John Garlinger, regional spokesman for the Social Security Administration.

Current Buchanan County Public Administrator Bill McMurray held strong hopes that would be the case. If that hadn’t been the case, Mr. McMurray and the county would have had the “unbelievable” task of dividing Ms. Lawson’s monthly restitution checks of perhaps $200 between more than 100 victims.

That process would not only have been complicated, but it would have done little to relieve any single victim.

“This is the right thing to do, and I’m glad they’re doing it,” Mr. McMurray said. “I applaud Social Security for doing the right thing.”

Ms. Lawson resigned in 2006 as Buchanan County public administrator, an office that oversees funds and care for court-appointed elderly and indigent people. On May 18, she’ll begin serving a 37-month prison sentence after pleading guilty to stealing clients’ Social Security benefits.

Ms. Lawson currently owes $115,658 in restitution to about 160 victims.

A federal judge ordered Ms. Lawson to pay 10 percent of her monthly income, or $100, whichever is greater. She currently collects a LAGERS pension from her own time in office, a pension from her husband Maurice Lawson’s time as a state representative, and Social Security benefits, according to officials in this week’s meeting.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
ActiveOpinion May 18, 2009 at 11:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)

A criminal corrupt-official can get off paying only 10% of her income. Luckily she wasn't just behind on child support payments, then they would take 50% without asking any questions!!

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: