NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Wind turbines on the roof?
City looks to future ordinances
by Clinton Thomas
Monday, May 4, 2009

Help may be on the way for St. Joseph residents frustrated with high electrical bills.

Personal wind turbines can lower electric costs for their owners, or in some cases, cause the meter to spin backward as the device produces more energy than is used.

City staff has started work on an ordinance that would allow the installation of wind turbines within the city limits.

Assistant City Planner Vicki Johnson said the city wants to be proactive, not reactive.

“We don’t have any information or any ordinance, so we can’t give people a permit because right now it’s prohibited,” Ms. Johnson said.

Interest has been light so far. Ms. Johnson said she didn’t know the exact number of inquiries the city had received but estimated it was closer to four or five than 10 or 20.

“It’s not an overwhelming amount of people,” Ms. Johnson said. “I don’t want everyone to think we’re going to have windmills in every backyard.”

The city is using a Wisconsin wind energy ordinance as a guide. The ordinance will set guidelines for where wind turbine towers may be constructed, how close they may be to property lines and roads, how tall they may be and other regulations.

For example, the city is tentatively looking at what Ms. Johnson called a “2-to-1 ratio” that would require a property line setback of twice the height of the tower — meaning a 60-foot tower must be 120 feet from the property line.

“We’re trying to make them as unobtrusive as possible,” Ms. Johnson said.

The turbines would not be restricted to residential use. The ordinance would allow provisions for commercial wind farms, though different from the large ones that have recently been constructed in Northwest Missouri. Some local businesses have enough land to house multiple wind turbines — classified as wind farms in the ordinance — that would provide power for their private use. Excess power could be sold back to the grid.

Ms. Johnson said the city had considered using wind power at the landfill, though no formal plans had been made.

The city also will evaluate rules for smaller turbines that can be mounted directly to roofs or other existing structures.

The ordinance is expected to be ready for the City Council this summer, possibly as early as June.

Clinton Thomas can be reached

at clintonthomas@npgco.com.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
hcat May 4, 2009 at 11:24 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The more popular wind power becomes, the less it will cost to build the turbines to produce it, making it much more cost effective for everyone. Solar power systems are a good example of this.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
tallest May 4, 2009 at 12:24 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The good ones cost about $15k. http://www.skystreamenergy.com/ .

From the looks of the proposed setback language, I don't know how people with a typical lot like mine could have room to install one of these. Of course, if you've got a big place and the money to match, its not a problem. Screwing the little guy again. One more reason to move out of this crumbling, upholstered sphincter of a city.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
donaldo May 4, 2009 at 4:22 p.m. (Suggest removal)

now now tallest, no need in getting dirty mouth.we need this technolegy but like you said a small lot and the distance from the property line. we dont have a chance even if we could afford it.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: