NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
What's Inside:
Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Education package heads to Nixon
Merit-pay system would get test run
by Alyson E. Raletz
Friday, May 15, 2009

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A legislative step away from teacher tenure protections is going to the governor’s desk.

The push toward a merit-pay system for educators only affects St. Louis City School District employees, but the move could have more far-reaching implications.

The Missouri legislature revived a comprehensive education package from Senate President Pro Tem Charlie Shields, R-St. Joseph, on Thursday despite an overwhelming defeat of a version roughly three times its size in the House earlier this week. While House members wanted to eliminate the voluntary merit-pay system, senators insisted that the measure, controversial among the statewide education community, be included.

“It will be interesting to see how many teachers participate in that,” Mr. Shields said of the merit-pay system. “It’s a pretty big piece of legislation.”

The bill gives St. Louis teachers the option to give up their tenure, which protects their permanent job status, for an opportunity to earn more money based on their performance under the Teacher Choice Compensation Package. Participating teachers would be able to earn up to $15,000 in additional income for superior performance based on student test scores, evaluations from students, supervisors and parents, and possibly other benchmarks set by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

Sen. Jane Cunningham, a St. Louis County Republican, praised the bill for including the controversial measure and setting up St. Louis as a state “pilot” for the compensation package.

“For the first time in the state of Missouri, we got merit pay,” Ms. Cunningham said.

SB 291 also eliminates tenure protections for non-certified employees in the St. Louis school district.

Rep. Martin Rucker, a St. Joseph Democrat who also sits on the St. Joseph Board of Education, opposes the compensation program because teachers who opt out of their tenure have no recourse if they dislike the merit system. The choice can’t be reversed.

The shorter bill still includes a fix to a technical glitch from the Proposition A gaming money voters approved in 2008.

Legislators stacked it with many other changes, such as allowing local school boards to vote to establish four-day school weeks, directing the Joint Committee on Education to study open enrollment and only requiring districts to make up 10 school days because of inclement weather, among other changes.

Also in the education package is an attempt to curb or at least delay high-school dropouts. The bill extends the drop-out age to 17 or when the student completes at least 16 credits. Students now can withdraw from high school at age 16.

“Kids need to stop thinking about their next birthday and start thinking about the next class they’re going to take,” Joplin School District Superintendent C.J. Huff told the Associated Press. Mr. Huff came up with the credit-hour requirement.

Deliberations in the Statehouse sent another bill from an area lawmaker to Gov. Jay Nixon’s desk Thursday. The House passed a measure that would allow electric companies to build costs from energy conservation programs into the utilities’ rates. SB 376 from Sen. Brad Lager, R-Savannah, is an attempt to help the utilities recover costs when they partner with customers on greener ways to operate, in lieu of building more coal and nuclear power plants. It also requires the state to buy appliances that meet energy efficiency specifications under the Energy Star program, part of a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency effort.

Alyson E. Raletz can be reached

at alysonraletz@npgco.com.

  COMMENT
These comments are a means for our readers to voice their opinion on local issues in and around the St. Joseph area.
The following comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. We do not review every post or respond to every suggestion for a comment to be removed.
Before posting, please read the following rules:
  • Comments that threaten someone or degrade them on the basis of gender, race, class, national origin, religion or disability will be removed.
  • Comments containing abusive, vulgar or sexually-oriented language will be removed.
  • Comments that spread rumors or lies will be removed. Please discuss only what has been factually proven.
  • Comments posted in all caps will be removed.
  • Stay on topic! Comments that stray away from the original topic will be deleted.
  • Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatant cutting and pasting is not acceptable.
  • Comments must be kept under 250 words or less.
  • Stjoenews.net moderators also reserve the right to remove comments for any reason they deem worthy.
Please read our user agreement
Wright_Winger May 15, 2009 at 5:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Imagine that!! A program to pay more for superior performance. Almost like what happens in the real world of work and reward. Oh, I forgot, we are talking about the government. Sorry.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 0
WhoisJohnGalt May 15, 2009 at 6:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It doesn't work that way. Who will you get to teach in the ghetto? Who will teach special education? That just moves the best teachers to the affluent suburbs. Any teacher pay plan that bases pay on test scores has the effect of economic segregation.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 0
wert4 May 15, 2009 at 6:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It is funny how we (America) continues to look for a solution to better teachers and higher test scores. The solution is simple, the power to discipline needs to be put back in place.

Recommend:
+ 3
- 0
Orliandor May 15, 2009 at 6:44 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Wert is correct. Students must understand that lack of discipline and poor grades elicit consequences that are enforced.

However, basing pay on student scores is ridiculous. Forget the merit pay. Instead, get rid of tenure now for all teachers, give severance checks to those who are ineffective or harmful to students, and increase the pay of those who are deemed effective by the experts; not students or tests, but administrators.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 0
retired_man May 15, 2009 at 8 a.m. (Suggest removal)

When a teacher’s job hinges on the success of the students, kissing the backside of the students, parents and their supervisors.
Most of them will stoop over and pucker up so they can keep their job.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
WhoisJohnGalt May 15, 2009 at 8:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Retiredman, what is more important? Teaching children or kissing rump? You just illustrated the crux of the problem.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Wright_Winger May 15, 2009 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

With The Obama regime, teaching children to kiss rump is possibly the most effective curriculum.

Recommend:
+ 1
- 2
Sidamo May 15, 2009 at 9:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Good, quality teachers will not feel threatened, but liberated by moves away from tenure.

People with a teaching job, however, may be irate.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
apmastrangelo May 15, 2009 at 10:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Want to improve the educational system - Stop lowering the standards on the presumption of a positive effect that it is allowing more fit in.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
src129 May 15, 2009 at 11:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

how many children attended the closing schools and does that number account for the amount of transfers that are going to be declined? If the schools have enough room for extra students they should allow a child to transfer to that class. why are transfers not being approved/declined based on class size? I don't agree with the teachers keeping the ability to transfer.

Recommend:
+ 0
- 0
Requires free stjoenews.net registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment: