Thursday, November 26, 2009
TOPEKA, Kan. - The latest round of state budget cuts have prompted the head of Kansas' National Guard to do his own version of base realignment and closure.
Maj. Gen. Tod Bunting plans to close 18 of the state's 56 National Guard armories. The moves will save nearly $157,000 in the fiscal year that ends June 30, and more than $260,000 in the following year.
"Even if we were to return to the funding levels we've had in recent years, we cannot continue to sustain viable operations in all 56 armories across the state," Bunting said. "This is a challenging time requiring difficult choices."
Bunting, the state's adjutant general, won't announce which armories will close until December, giving time to meet with communities and notify National Guard members. He has been operating the Guard's armories with only 65 percent of the money necessary to keep them functioning for some time, he said.
The changes mean that 19 full-time National Guard soldiers will be reassigned to other armories, while 678 soldiers will be forced to go to other locations for regular drills. The closures and consolidation of people and equipment is expected to be complete by June 30, 2010. The buildings, some which were built in the 1950s, will be transferred to local communities for use and removed from state property inventory.
The changes only affect Army National Guard facilities and not any of the Air National Guard locations at McConnell Air Force Base in Wichita, Forbes Field in Topeka or Smoky Hill Air National Guard Range in Salina.
The adjutant general said that it isn't likely that any of the armories would be reopened in the coming years as state revenues rebound and that additional closures and consolidations may be required. He gave similar statements to legislators when testifying in October during hearings.
"They will only be done as these were, after careful consideration of the impact of our mission, public safety capabilities and long-term sustainability," Bunting said.
With the cuts announced Monday, the adjutant general's budget is a little more than $5 million in state funds, not counting debt service and disaster relief dollars. Activities associated with the National Guard, such as salaries for soldiers and airmen, maintaining equipment and training, are covered by federal funds appropriated by Congress.
Some of the armories will remain unoccupied while equipment and personnel are transferred and operations are consolidated.
Kansas has closed a handful of armories in the past decade, including the ones in Belleville and Mankato earlier in 2009. Typically the closures have been because of shifting populations and not enough Guardsmen in the areas to support having a drill or training location.


Share Your Thoughts
Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Click here for our full user agreement.
skeptic says...
Since Bush invasions of the Middle East, the Kansas National Guard has existed to provide cannon fodder for an impossible task.
When Greensburg, Kansas was destroyed with the tornado, the Guard lacked sufficient equipment to effectively respond, as a great deal of it had been deployed to the war zone. That's the same thing that happened in New Orleans, except there Bush, Chertoff and Michael ("You're doing a great job, Brownie") Brown brought in Blackwater's (named changed to "Xe" to protect the guilty) mercenaries as an armed, enormously expensive, occupying force.
Kansas has become more vulnerable to other natural disasters such as floods. I assume Missouri is having a similar problem.
I suspect that dozens of Guard members from Missouri and Kansas have been killed, but statistics are a little hard to find. Michael Barry, one MO Guard member for instance, is listed on Kansas casualty list as being a regular Army member from Overland Park. Scores more have been seriously wounded or injured.
November 26, 2009 at 2:07 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )
Leonie says...
And your point is?
November 27, 2009 at 8:25 p.m. ( permalink | suggest removal )