Hyperlink Legend · E-mail story · Comments · iPod friendly version · Print friendly version

Still hooked on cigarettes
Despite a dramatic shift in how the culture views smoking, new data show the habit’s on the rise here
by Erin Wisdom
Tuesday, July 8, 2008

More doctors smoke Camels than any other cigarette.

That’s the claim, anyway, made in a 1930s advertisement featuring a white-coat-clad, spectacle-wearing medical professional with a cigarette poised between his fingers.

In another ad, a chubby-cheeked baby implores her mother to smoke a Marlboro instead of scolding her.

And in case neither a doctor’s endorsement nor a child’s plea are enough encouragement to smoke, an ad featuring a young Ronald Reagan packs a double-whammy — promising that any “studly guy” who smokes “lots and LOTS” of Pall Mall cigarettes will both “turn on the ladies” and “rise to political success.”

As ludicrous as these decades-old messages seem today, statistics for 2007 show that cigarette marketing still is effective in Buchanan County — especially among the 18- to 24-year-old age group.

“They are going after young people, that’s for sure,” says Steve Wenger, process leader for Heartland Regional Medical Center. “They know once they have them hooked, they’ll use cigarettes a long time.”

The 2007 Buchanan County data, which is now available at www.stjoehealthinfo.org, reports that 37 percent of 18- to 24-year-olds smoke — a 2 percent increase from 2005.

Most other age groups saw a similar increase, resulting in a total smoker rate of 26 percent, which compares to a national rate of 20 percent.

The data also show the rate is highest among the least-educated and poorest residents of the county, which matches what is true about smoking and socioeconomic status on a national level. A recent study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that was published in the July/August issue of the American Journal of Health Promotion reports that some poor families actually choose to purchase cigarettes rather than food — something many might find hard to believe but that made sense to the researchers.

“Smoking is an addiction that gets established in adolescence, before individuals fully understand the long-term implications of their behavior,” Dr. Brian Armour, who led the researchers, says in an article published by Health Behavior News Service. “Poor families suffer the long-term health impact.”

But despite the fact that Buchanan County, like the demographic studied by the CDC, has a significant percentage of poor individuals who smoke, there is good news, Mr. Wenger says: The overall smoker rate is still down from when it was at its highest — 31 percent — in 2001. Programs aimed at assisting smokers in kicking the habit likely have played a part in this decrease, but Betty Richey, the leader of Heartland’s cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation units, knows there’s still plenty left to do.

“I think overall, smokers know what the major consequences of nicotine use are,” says Ms. Richey, who leads freedom-from-smoking classes at Heartland. “They just may not be able to accept that these consequences will happen to them.”

Among the most significant consequences of smoking are, of course, heart disease, lung cancer and stroke. But even for people willing to play the odds with these — as well as for young smokers who may assume they’re decades away from having to worry about being sick — smoking has immediate effects on the body.

And not all of these are bad. Nicotine hits the brain within seven seconds of entering the body, Ms. Richey says, and causes the smoker to feel calmer and more alert. But it also causes blood vessels to constrict, making the heart work harder and blood pressure increase. At the same time, the blood is carrying a lot less oxygen than usual.

“Think about people who already have trouble breathing due to something like asthma,” she says, “and imagine using nicotine on top of that. It’s really not good.”

In addition, wounds that occur where blood vessels have become diseased due to nicotine have a more limited ability to heal. Experiencing symptoms like this may not always be enough to make smokers give up the habit, Ms. Richey says, but she has seen people commit to quit after having family members die of a smoking-related disease.

Maybe it’s experiences like this that have inspired a new generation of smoking (or, rather, anti-smoking) ads — ads like one with a woman named Trudi who was diagnosed with lung cancer at 38, one with a man named Ronaldo who was diagnosed with throat cancer at 39.

There’s even a series of ads featuring a New York man who began smoking as a child and still smokes half a pack a day, despite losing part of one leg and having two heart attacks before age 30 due to smoking.

“Cigarette smoking is killing Skip Legault,” one ad says. “Don’t let it kill you.”

Say goodbye to smokes

The freedom-from-smoking classes offered by Heartland Regional Medical Center take place in eight-week sessions and help smokers make a plan for dealing with quitting. The next session will begin in the fall.

Heartland also offers one-on-one counseling for smokers. For more information about this or the classes, call 271-7835.

Lifestyles reporter Erin Wisdom can be reached at ewisdom@npgco.com.

Comments
This story has 11 comments. Click here to join in on the discussion.
Story Tools
Hyperlink Legend
E-mail story
Print friendly version
iPod friendly version

Today's Top Headlines
Not in Kansas
Shearin unites holiday events
Two charged in shooting incidents
Alliance considers highway system’s future
‘Mommy had not an easy life’
Posted by heritage on July 8, 2008 at 8:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

the state of missouri has the lowest tax on cigarettes in the nation.

Posted by comment on July 8, 2008 at 10:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)

You know, our government tickets people for not wearing their seat belt or not wearing a motorcycle helmet because they claim it saves lives and many long term hospital care tax dollars. Do you see where I'm going with this. Its hopeless until you nip the source in the bud!

Posted by biggieroth on July 8, 2008 at 11:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Nanny state.

Posted by heritage on July 8, 2008 at 11:29 a.m. (Suggest removal)

not nanny state. i am absolutely pro-choice for smokers, and the taxation of their consumption. last time i checked it was still legal. missouri should however be taxing the consumption more, and using those dollars to fund assistance for quitting for those who want to.

Posted by gopguy on July 8, 2008 at 3:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Ah yes! Let the state use the "dollars to fund assistance for quitting for those who want to". We see what a great job AG Jay Nixon has done with the winnings from suing tobacco companies.
More power to the state? Please. That is a nanny state. I have no problem with taxing the consumption, but why use excessive taxation as a reason to give the state more control?
Raising taxes on tobacco does not encourage people to quit. It is proven.

Posted by largesock on July 8, 2008 at 4:55 p.m. (Suggest removal)

gopguy:

It is not proven that raising taxes encourages people to stop smoking. In fact, evidence points to the opposite being true.

"There is strong scientific evidence that shows increases in state and federal excise taxes on tobacco products reduce consumption and increase the number of people who stop using tobacco. Price increases reduce consumption of tobacco products by adults, young adults, adolescents, and children." -- From a surgeon general's report at http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/sgr_2001/highlight_use.htm

Posted by gopguy on July 9, 2008 at 8:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Show me a statistic --- the "strong scientific evidence" ---- not a quote from a government bureaucrat who relies on taxes to feed his overpriced salary. Nothing in that link shows how a higher price on tobacco directly relates to a reduction in the number of smokers. The link talks about state funded programs and other methods to quit, but it DOES NOT show that "strong scientific evidence".

Posted by heritage on July 9, 2008 at 8:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)

gopguy ....i wonder? do you smoke? i am suggesting that missouri has a ridiculously low tax rate on cigarettes, and that it should be adjusted. i reiterate that i am not anti choice for smokers, nor do i think this city should go smokeless. it is up to the individual businessman to decide whether they want to allow a legal activity in their establishment. i choose to go to foster's downtown over the snakebite most of the time because i do not care for the smoke. that is a choice that i am glad to make, and to have the ability to do so.
there is hard evidence on the rise in attendance in smoking cessation programs along with the rise in the putative taxes in NYC. that link has not been able to be linked as "hard evidence" because there are so many variables.

Posted by 4wildones on July 9, 2008 at 10:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Maybe if the clerks in all the gas stations would card kids and quit selling cigarettes to underage kids, and the schools would do something about all these underage kids smoking in their parking lots there might be fewer teenagers smoking. From experience, we tried everything we could to keep our underage son from smoking. But when the clerks kept selling them to him we were fighting a loosing battle. We turned in more than one station that we had proof of selling to him and nothing happened to the clerks (high school kids) or the stations. I took his photo around to the gas stations and told them this kid was underage and yet they STILL sold him cigarettes. The city needs to crack down on that because that IS illegal.

Posted by gopguy on July 9, 2008 at 10:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Heritage,
If, as you state, "that link has not been able to be linked as 'hard evidence' because there are so many variables.", then why would 'largesock' and the Surgeon General state there is "strong scientific evidence".
This has everything to do with giving government more control. Look at the tax/ban NYC passed on trans-fat. Is this where we are headed? We ARE becomming 'a nanny state', plain and simple. I need government to tell me what is bad for my helath because I am to ignornant to determine that for myself. I need government to tell me what to do and make my decisions for me. Next thing you know, I am so weak and dependent on government that when the floodwaters get to high, I am not smart enough to leave but would rather sit on my own roof and wonder where 'Big Brother' is to rescue me.

Posted by wickedtruth on July 9, 2008 at 3:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The gas station clerks in this town won't card for cigarettes or alcohol...it's more important to keep the flow of business traffic going rather than to abide by the law. Just yesterday I was in a particular convenience store near Belt and Mitchell and the girl in front of me had a case of beer. Rather than doing her job and asking for ID, the clerk simply asked the girl what her date of birth is, which she rattled off. This same C-store has been "busted" before in the citywide stings that are conducted.


Post a comment

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them.

Rules: We don't allow comments that degrade others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability. Epithets, abusive language and obscene comments will not be tolerated... nor will defamation. Brief quotes are okay as long as the source is given. Blatent cutting and pasting is not acceptable.

Robust, even heated debate we like. Straying off-topic or flaming, we don't. Please read our user agreement.

Requires free stjoenews.net registration
.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:


Business
Location


Iframe Content
  • More Headlines
  • Recently Discussed
It takes two Friday, Dec. 5, 2008

Show-biz heavy metal Friday, Dec. 5, 2008

A thread of hope Friday, Dec. 5, 2008

The Shuffle: Baby, one more time? Friday, Dec. 5, 2008