NEWS
CLASSIFIEDS
AUTO
HOMES
JOBS
Comments by bizmom

Page 1 of 1

Posted on September 25, 2008 at 2:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Please don't flatter yourself. You're words are rambling and a feeble attempt to, once again, sound intelligent. And yes, there are many of us on here who like to be anonymous. We actually value our opinion and privacy and don't choose to be arrogant and pompous by letting the entire community know who we are. So don't play brave. All I'm saying is that I completely disagree with the fact that you say this reporter's story was false. Lack of detail and a hint of research maybe but false? Those are big accusations. Anyway, I am done here. Unlike you I say my piece and move on. I have better things to do with my time. I'll keep reading the papers, watching the news and laughing at comments. Well, actually many of them are interesting so . . . .

On English-only amendment sparks heated debate

Posted on September 25, 2008 at 2:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Wow. I don't know if I'm more shocked by such obvious displays of hatred by MichaelH or appreciative of such supportive comments for my being a mom. The irony here is that your last post just goes to prove my earlier comments. You took a three letter word from my user name and transcribed that to mean barefoot, pregnant and a slave to housework. Are we really suppose to believe that you read any of these articles and proceed to have a commonsense thought. That's sad. Yet the truth is that by displaying your rather unintelligent chatter you've managed to become discredited and now the laughing stock of all bloggers on this site.
NOTE: We should all probably not continue on about mothers, housework or questioning whether or not MichaelH even has a mom, because that would be considered straying off topic and might get us shut down.
Ta ta for now. May you all have a great day.

On Fuel-saving tactics cut costs, add risks

Posted on September 24, 2008 at 4:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree LDM, MichaelH is at best, childish. I made a more detailed post on my position regarding him. You should check it out. Anyway, informative can be perceived on different levels. So, I agree with some of the posters here. While Megan's story could have been more detailed with more research, I see no falsehoods, fabrications or lies. And since everyone is being so petty, technically, in the cut line of the photo that everyone can "so clearly" tell is not directly behind the semi, it doesn't even say that the car is so how's that for far fetched.

On Fuel-saving tactics cut costs, add risks

Posted on September 24, 2008 at 3:43 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I’m sorry . . . I’m still just chuckling to myself about MichaelH. It’s truly amazing reading your comments, trying to make yourself sound so intelligent. I should really start checking your writing to see if it's plagiarism. Wow, if you don’t like the News-Press so much why are you on this site every day and all day posting comments. Get a life already. I’m thinking you’re the real phony, have you seen your MySpace page recently. There’s not an accurate thing on it yet you talk about all the inaccuracies of fellow posters and media outlets. Who are you trying to prove yourself to anyway, don’t you know these things are anonymous.
I have been watching this site for months now and have finally decided to chime in. People always say, how insignificant an article is yet they seem to read it and even feel the need to spend time in their "important" life to comment on it. So where does the problem really lie? I myself find all news information, front page or not, of value. It affects someone somewhere.

On English-only amendment sparks heated debate

Page 1 of 1